Featured Post

A tale from times to never revisit again - my mother making it at no odds

This book is about the times at the Second World War end and what happened just before the ending and up to later years with respect to t...

onsdag 24 september 2014

Justification of criminal acts of war common practise in the era of Jihad


If I was a Jehova's witness I would say that with this last developments of aggression based on delusion and lies and illegal and unlawful intervention this world is coming to its end. Finally the dreaded F22 Raptors (even by pilots refusing to fly them) being the secret weapon of the empire not exported to any country are being used in aggression (combat by the finest military servicemen of the world according to Obama in his latest speech). Well congratulations to this fine piece of flying evil costing about 400 million USD a piece not considered the cost of the bombs you are dropping killing innocent people. Just imagine what the money of a few raptors would do to lessen suffering for people of this world. As long as you let your mind inflicted by fear govern you and your nation you'll always end up making the situation worse for yourself and for all of us, imprisoned on this planet. Surrender to make yourself free, to know the "being", your true peaceful self. And this is for Mr Obama too, free yourself of the demands of you, from your administration, from your agencies and make your dream come true the realization of the promises you made in your election campaign that made you win the Nobel peace prize. Don't be a coward, don't back off, stick to what you said, being mainstream will just bring you down to another mediocre one of the history. Killing Usama bin Laden will not do it in the books for you it'll just bring resentment towards you, all over the the planet.

Every day I see new means and methods to justify going to war, like intervening and invading "rouge states", extraordinary rendition invented by the Bush regime to pick up supposed to be terrorists on sovereign states territories, calling any militant movements terrorists, no matter of what sort as long as they are against the incumbent US friendly regimes. Sweden has been a US ally since after the World War II, helping in spying on the east block even though under the flag of a neutral state but hiding it well from the world under in particular the Social Democrat regimes of Sweden. Our secret relations with US government cracked wide open when one of those grey aircrafts without the common designation letters on the body descended on Swedish soil in 2002 to pick some alleged financiers of al Qaeda, approved by the Swedish government and signed off by secretary of state Anna Lind. They were taken to one of the US "rendition" places in Egypt to be tortured by contractors keeping blood away from the hands of US government.

This one is about how willing the Swedish society is to justify aggression by our ally the US, by any means and in this case the air attacks by the US and it's brothers in arms on IS (not Obamas ISIL with is a demeaning rewriting of the organization’s name that in reality extends far beyond the Levant) on Syrian soil. This by Swedish media very much used Ove Bring, "Professor Emeritus" in International law is claiming that the US and its partners are in full rights to intervene in and over a sovereign state, in this case Syria. And the explanation is that according to some fuzzy UN toothless laws, intervention by an "lawful" external agent may be done when the government of that sovereign state is incapable of protecting it's own people. Now pay special attention to the word "lawful" in the previous sentence. See, the US comes in from a standpoint of being a legal, lawful governing body of Iraq protecting the interests of Iraq while being an unlawful aggressor intervening in Iraq and taking unlawful control of it based on the lies to protect the world from Saddam Hussein's Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD). We all know that there were none and also know that UN controlling the borders of Iraq prior to the intervention was forced to leave it's positions weeks before any UN decision was made on the issue when US troops came in and opened up "holes" in the border preparing for a non UN sanctioned attack. The UN is toothless manipulated clown that no living being on earth should hold trust in and makes more harm to the planet than if it would not exist at all, only smoke screens of hope for this world. And it cost too much money, money that could be used to cure Ebola patients in Africa and feed the starving.

When this "Professor Emeritus" Ove Bring of International law once again utters his "expert" opinion in favor of stupidity it just shows how incompetent Swedish media has become. There are no experienced reporters any more as they are to expensive to keep going. The trend is to go out and "buy" an "expert" willing to write something to lower cost than what it would take to keep an experienced professional reporter going for years on a payroll.

If you did not understand what I was saying, I'll rephrase it to just say that the attacks within Syria today are illegal, unlawful, stupid and inhuman. And apart from that we are spilling bombs over innocent people creating even more suffering than what IS would ever do.

Take that, Carl Bildt (Secretary of State) and Fredrik Reinfeldt (Prime minister) in your last days of governing Sweden. Your ideology has been making money, having a good life for yourself and being seen by others.

I hope some people in Russia will read this and figure out that even if you are communists you are not alone in this screwed up world of politics and madness. You Russians should not feel at ease with this, you have a process of dealing with your guilt ahead of you. You killed my grandfather, my uncle and many more in my family that I never got to see or know and it still hurts many years after I got aware of what you did to my future.


fredag 19 september 2014

Could awarness of the now make humans content and end all aggressions on the planet?



Do you believe that your mind is you like in the famous statement: I think therefore I am (Descartes)? Or is this just an unconscious state of being, a zombie state that most humans on planet earth live? What if there was another dimension of us that did not live in the past (the already passed dead) or the future (nonexistent, did not happen yet)? A dimension of us, always aware of the instant of now – sometimes called the “observer” for which the past and the present mean nothing. Most of us lives our life’s in pain inflicted by “bad” memories of passed times or on hopes to reach the end of the rainbow completely blind for the moment in which we are. What is this my enigmatic fuzz about? I have been practicing Zen for many years, now having a break as many do, when life and mind takes control. Recently I stumbled over a book, one of those best sellers: “the power of now” by Eckhart Tolle, a non-religious “tale” about awareness of that precious moment that we all live but are ignorant of or blind to. I found no contradiction to my own wisdom of Zen but a slightly different way of looking at the issue of the interior of one self, of one-ness, a great complementing teaching about how to come to peace with myself.

Now it is time for a small tale: The insightful being and “scientist” Carl Jung tells in of his books of a conversation he had with a native American chief who pointed out to him that in his perspective most white people have tense faces, staring eyes and cruel demeanor. He said: “They are always seeking something. What are they seeking? The whites always want something. They are always uneasy and restless. We don’t know what they want. We think they are mad.”

I think this still holds for a pretty good description of us people in western style regions. We are always looking for greener grass or filled up with anxiety or fear even though we know that our time is limited here.

Could we be content without a continous wanting of new possessions, without being held back and crippled by attachments, without always thinking about coming to and end?

tisdag 16 september 2014

The Swedish Election, what happened, do we have an immigration issue?

Passed another election in Sweden. The incumbent coalition controlled by the conservatives fell off the throne. Why did this happened despite being such a "responsible" government hailed by the rest of the countries in European union for it's perfomance through years of economical upheaval in the world around this tiny insignificant nation. The answer to the question why this government failed to maintain position governing Sweden for another four year is this: just a few month before the election, the prime minister Fredrik Reinfeldt went out proclaiming the government would support an accelerated immigration to Sweden, expressing his concerns about the necessity to accomodate refugees from the planet's hot spots and how beneficial it will be to Sweden to become a true multicultural society. This went on and on drawing closer to the election day something we here had never seen from party leader ever and considering this small nation that already had taken a big load of immigrants from all the corners of the world even bleeding from immigrant gang wars over drug territory with more deaths and executions that we have ever seen through the history of the nation. As a result of this one in every four for the previous mandate period that voted for the conservatives went to a party that most Swedes (87%) considers neo nazis in this election and that gained 13% of all votes making the third largest party in Sweden.

We Swedes don't want more immigrants at least not an accelerated influx for now. We are not prepared to accommodate more. We are unable to cope with or accomodate the Romes coming from other parts of the union that creates their living in parks within the cities of major Swedish cities, I can say a lot about that as I am having colony of romes 200 meters from my house that is at 10 minutes distance from the Stockholm city center. Nobody wants more immigrants but no one can say this in public without being called and labeled racist. We can say it by voting only as our vote remains the sole thing in the Swedish society that is private and close to holy.

Well, back to the conservative party and its leaders, Fredrik Reinfeldt and Anders Borg. Why did they manage to keep good old Sweden afloat. I would say that any government would have had as this country still is living on the surplus of the eras of the great world wars and the years following the great wars of the world. We could deliver products during the wars, iron ore for the Germans before and during world war one and two and after rebuilding Europe with a development and manufacturing machine intact unaffected by the wars. Lately the funds to keep Sweden afloat has come from selling off government industries created in those days of wars, not only within the weapons section but all kinds that we had in abundance over here created mainly by Sweden's Socialistic heritage.

We have had a government in Sweden that has done nothing else then selling off public business, cutting taxes, keeping people out of unemployment benefits, keeping disabled people out of social wellfare and importing cheap labor from around the poor states of Europe, working for nothing.

No grace to Fredrik Reinfeldt, Anders Borg and their over-aged clown, USA leachead foreign minister Carl Bildt. The last thing heard from the "duo" is that they now would get more time for hunting (hunting (killing) animals (for pleasure)).

Would a normal human like having leaders like that running a nation?

And  imagine a nation having a government coming out from the closet a few months before the election claiming their love to a multi cultural society? Well, as I said, this is what made the incumbent government fall.

The outlook for Sweden and it's possibly socialistic government seem bleek, just think about a prime minister that for the first time in Swedish history does not speak English! May God have mercy with us...